Even with Covid, Muni bond report shows defaults remain rare

By Michael Cohick, Senior ETF Project Manager, VanEck.

In early July, Moody’s Investors Service released its annual snapshot of the municipal bond market, US Municipal Bond Defaults and Recoveries, 1970-2020, with updates through 2020. In addition to highlighting their resilience to COVID-19 (“Covid”) pandemic, the report continues to assert two characteristic advantages offered by municipal bonds. First, while they may have become more common in the past 10 years, defaults and municipal bankruptcies are still scarce overall. (Indeed, during the period of significant market tension in 2020 resulting from Covid, there were only two municipal defaults and none related to the virus.) Second, municipal bonds continue to be highly rated relative to corporations. While there were downgrades in municipal ratings during the year, downgrades in global corporate ratings s were more common.

Once again, an important “observation” noted in this year’s report was that over the 50-year study period: “[A]A single default may only reflect the peculiarities of that individual credit and may not be representative of a general industry trend.

Regarding the pandemic, Moody’s notes that the municipal market has experienced “a very unique set of stresses resulting from closures related to the virus, and [that] these have unleashed a series of new dynamics that will shape municipal finances in the future. These include the “rapid acceleration” of distance learning and working and, associated with these, the remoteness from high density jobs and life.

Muni Bond defaults and bankruptcies remain rare

The report drew attention, once again, to the fundamental difference between municipal and corporate credits.

The cumulative default rate (CDR) of all five-year rated municipal bonds throughout the study period (1970-2020) has remained unchanged at 0.08% and still remains very low. Likewise compared to the five-year CDR of 6.89% for global companies over the same period. Of the two municipal defaults in 2020, one was rated and the other “by an entity rated by Moody’s, albeit on an unrated instrument”.

Regarding the only default noted by Moody’s, triggered in early May by the bankruptcy of the Archdiocese of New Orleans, the report noted that the filing, seemingly preventive and defensive, illustrated a new trend, along with other examples of such actions. by nearly 20% of all Catholic dioceses in the United States, the utility PG&E and the Boy Scouts of America.

With respect to Puerto Rico, Moody’s continued to note in its report: “Puerto Rico, although being an American territory, reinforces a trend that we have observed elsewhere, namely that a bankruptcy or similar proceeding. bankruptcy can not only affect collections differently from country to country. separate debt categories, but also may not hurt all debt categories to begin with. In other words, these procedures can affect the categories of debt differently with different levels of severity.

Stable odds despite the coronavirus crisis

In the two years leading up to the pandemic, stabilizing credit quality in the municipal bond industry had been aided by economic growth and recovery in many parts of the United States. , not only were there fewer rating changes during the year than in previous years, but rating volatility also decreased. In addition, “rating downgrades were essentially equivalent to rating upgrades”.

Municipal credits remain strong and, according to the report, “their rating distribution is significantly skewed towards the investment grade, where ratings tend to be more stable.”

The report added that the municipal sector as a whole remains highly rated, with around 91% of all Moody’s municipal lending rates falling to Category A or higher by the end of 2020 (2019: ≈92%). In addition, by the end of 2020, the median US municipal credit score had only fallen to Aa3 (2019: Aa2). This still contrasted sharply with the median rating of global companies, which was Baa3 (2019: Baa2).

Conclusion

We continue to assert that while it remains difficult to obtain the same amount of timely information from municipal bond issuers as in other asset classes, we believe that the empirical evidence pure suggests that municipal bonds still offer a fiscally sound vehicle for deriving a stream of income exempt from federal and, in some cases, state taxes. We believe that looking at the behavior of the municipal market during the Covid crisis in 2020 is enough to get prima facie evidence of its “strength” and resilience (and municipal bonds).

Looking at long-term municipal bonds, across all sectors, between 1970 and 2020, according to the Moody’s report, there were only 114 separate defaults rated by Moody’s, representing just over $ 72 billion. dollars, from a universe of over 50,000 different state and local governments and other issuing authorities. However, as always, there are caveats. As Moody’s states once again in the report’s introduction: “The once-comfortable aphorism that ‘munis don’t default’ is no longer credible: rating volatility, rating transition rates and rates. Cumulative Defects (CDRs) have all increased since 2010. ”However, even when under stress from the virus, they have remained surprisingly stable so far.

The challenges facing this sector include demographic changes (aging and relocated populations – affecting tax revenues), “substantial increases in the leverage on pensions and retirement health care” and “exposures increases associated with the stock markets ”. In addition to these challenges, it remains to be seen what the full effects will be of the new dynamic that has only become all too apparent with the arrival and devastation caused by Covid.

Despite this, we still believe that municipal bonds remain important to the basic strategy of building an individual portfolio.

Learn more about VanEck’s lineup of municipal bond ETFs.

Originally posted by VanEck on Aug 31, 2021.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

Source: Moody’s Investors Service: Defaults and Collections of U.S. Municipal Bonds, 1970-2020

Please note that VanEck may offer investment products that invest in the asset class (s) or sectors included in this commentary.

This is not an offer to buy or sell, nor a recommendation to buy or sell the securities / financial instruments mentioned in this document. The information presented does not imply the provision of personalized investment, financial, legal or tax advice. Certain statements contained in this document may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward-looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are valid as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. Information provided by third party sources is believed to be reliable and has not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. VanEck does not guarantee the accuracy of third party data. The information contained in this document represents the opinion of the author (s), but not necessarily those of VanEck.

The main risks of investing in VanEck Vectors ETFs include sector, market, economic, political, currency, global event, index tracking and non-diversification risks, as well as fluctuations in value. assets and the risks associated with investing in less developed capital. markets. The Funds may lend their securities which may expose them to additional credit and counterparty risk. ETFs that invest in high yield securities are subject to the risks associated with investing in high yield securities; which carry a greater risk of loss of income and capital than funds holding higher-rated securities; concentration risk; credit risk; hedging risk; interest rate risk; and the risk of short selling. ETFs that invest in small cap companies are subject to high risks, which include, among other things, greater volatility, lower trading volume and less liquidity than larger companies. Please consult the prospectus of each Fund for more complete information regarding the specific risks of each Fund.

Investing involves substantial risk and high volatility, including possible loss of capital. An investor should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of a Fund before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck / etf.com. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.

Learn more at ETFtrends.com.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.


Source link

About Meredith Campagna

Check Also

Stocks to watch: HUL, ACC, Airtel, L&T Infotech, SBI, RIL, Adani Ports, IEX

Markets are expected to open higher on positive global signals and strong corporate earnings. At …